If you want to test for real, get a friend to power on a wireless access point not too far from you. Then get them to ‘pretend’ that they have. See if you can notice the difference without being told.

That’s what I’d do.

Chris

I will tell you this though..
FACT 1: Sometimes when I am in front of my laptop and trying to connect to wireless, I almost feel like my head is acting like a boosting antennae, its so obvious that I have to move away from the laptop to break it. Obviously something is going on in my head related but while no one has linked this to brain cancer, no one has proved that my conditions here are not leading to it.

FACT 2: While using a cellphone during the day, sometimes, my head feels like its spinning with pain similar to if one had kicked me hard in the head and i might have been bleeding internally (that kind of pain) which I wouldn’t doubt that is what is happening but I then switch to the other ear for a while till that side of my head bothers me & vice versa.

FACT 3: When I don’t use these things nearby, I never (and I mean absolutely never) have these symptoms.

It should be required for these companies to have to find out what these symptoms are & their long term effects. If it involves brain cancer and people who don’t choose to be exposed are, then these carriers should be forced to have to move their transceivers. I can tell you this, i will either tank my cellphones or hardly use them at all and I don’t care how much I like them, if I find they would cause tumors.

I just find it really hard to believe that the World Health Organisation and the public protection agencies of both the British and US governments are deliberately sacrificing the population for cash.

Take smoking for example.

I believe that tax on smoking generates around £10 billion GBP a year (or nearly 20 billion USD!) in the UK. The cost of treating smoking related diseases however amount to a couple of billion GBP a year. Despite this massive cash cow, the government actively persecutes smokers. It launched a smoking ban in public places back in July, it spends millions on advertising, health programmes and promotion in supporting its strong stance against smoking.

If the government won’t comprimise public safety for £10 billion GBP a year, then why whould it sacrifice its people for a one of payment of £20 billion GBP?

That doesn’t make sense mate…

Think about it – the likelihood of the British government bending over and sacrificing the health and well-being of hundreds and thousands of its citizens just to earn a few quid is pretty ludicrous. When they were found out there would be revolt on a grand scale!”

Chris, this is an unbeleivably naive viewpoint. The British government received 22 BILLION from the last mobile phone contract. They are more influenced by industry than anybody.

Btw, the revolt is happening! Just look at how many mobile phone mast and electrosensitivity campaign groups there are worldwide.

WiFi is on the unlicensed spectrum…. What the heck are you on about man!

You’re talking about 3G licensing…. Totally different thing.

I’ve got to stop typing now – the government keeps stealing my brain waves.

I bought a new pair of pants yesterday. When I put them on, and walked across the street I was hit by a car. I’ve never been hit by a car before… It must be the new pants…