Open Source software is great. Unfortunately with the Novell/Microsoft farce riding high in the news at the moment it could do with some good press. It’s not about to get some…
One of the common factors cited in implimentation of Open Source software alongside increased security etc is lower total cost of ownership. With multiple support vendors, enthusiastic community support and no typical licensing fees it looks like a winner. It should be easy shouldn’t it ?
Enter Birmingham City Council ICT. Golden custodians of the Open Source flame and trailblazers of free software in local government.
With a budget of £535,000 the council had a plan to deploy Linux software to 1,500 desktops. This pilot scheme aimed to demonstrate the maturity of Linux on the desktop, and it’s potential as a financially viable alternative to Microsoft Windows… Unfortunately it didn’t.
Birmingham City Council managed to deploy Linux to 200 PCs with it’s half a million quid. That’s £2,500 per desktop. Experts had some choice words to say.
“That’s ridiculous,” said Eddie Bleasdale, the owner of open-source consultancy NetProject and an early participant in the project. “It’s an unbelievable cock-up… They decided to do it all themselves, without expertise in the area,”
Mark Taylor, from the Open Source Consortium said: “I have no idea how anyone could spend half a million pounds on 200 desktops, running free software”.
The council’s project ended with them deciding that an upgrade to Windows XP would have been £100,000 cheaper than moving to Linux. As a user of both Microsoft and Linux in a similar environment all I can say is it’s project management gone mad.
Typically like many government projects the bureaucracy outweighs the technology. The whole thing stands up as a senseless waste of taxpayers money at a time when cut backs are rife. This angers me because it makes it even more difficult to get IT management to use Open Source software. Please think - this is an exception rather than the rule…